tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9172766774137902766.post2066473481198623484..comments2023-12-23T09:28:20.869+00:00Comments on The View from Cullingworth: Nannying Fussbucket of the Week: Cllr Audrey LewisUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9172766774137902766.post-26745800954755328312012-07-26T10:21:19.955+01:002012-07-26T10:21:19.955+01:00In light of this, LOCOG's desire to enforce Ol...In light of this, LOCOG's desire to enforce Olympic branding rules, and I'm sure many other examples, do you think it's a case that British authorities are 'better' at this - or should that be more rigorous - than other authorities around the world?Phil Rusehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13040474351783645703noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9172766774137902766.post-63195028435958160862012-07-25T22:26:15.938+01:002012-07-25T22:26:15.938+01:00Since they are such legal genuises (but a little s...Since they are such legal genuises (but a little short on humanity), why couldn't they have put a clause in the original license contract starting with something like, "and in the circumstance that the event runs longer than licensed, increments of time over will be computed and billed at the end, continuance of all features of said license will prevail during the period of time over-runs, and not to exceed ### units of time" - or words to that effect. I mean, they are referring to lawyers - if they had a heart to go along with that brain, they might have thought up such an idea, in advance, on all licensing contracts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com