Showing posts with label change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label change. Show all posts
Thursday, 27 July 2017

Now, about those robots...

›
From Deirdre McCloskey : If the nightmare of technological unemployment were true, it would already have happened, repeatedly and massively...
Sunday, 15 December 2013

A London Tale: the merely stinking rich shoved out by the filthy rich...

›
**** Andrew Marr, who is pretty rich by most folks standard's is moaning in The Spectator : A recent victim is Cork Street, for gen...
1 comment:
Wednesday, 24 November 2010

Schools, choice and competition - why we have to change

›
While scrabbling around the – mostly unedifying – debate about education in England it came to me that the problem really comes down to a f...
1 comment:
Saturday, 12 June 2010

Change, management and 'getting out of the way'

›
Having spent a surprisingly good day at the Local Gov Camp, I thought I'd ponder on a puzzle posed (in a roundabout kind of way) by Emm...
1 comment:
Friday, 1 January 2010

Change, drunkeness and the threat of tutting

›
*** Since everyone’s* burbling about change in that usual frantic new year kind of way I thought I’d join in. Not in the personal developmen...
2 comments:
Tuesday, 10 November 2009

Can I be ten again, Sir?

›
When I was ten…. We climbed over the fence to play football in the school grounds (it is only a rumour that we climbed on the roof) & co...
2 comments:
Sunday, 8 November 2009

Afghanistan: so what's changed?

›
I have been re-reading Meyer & Brysac ’s wonderful “Tournament of Shadows” – a breathtaking gallop through the “Great Game” and the co...