Thursday, 3 February 2011

So what was it you said about passive smoking, again?


Do I get the feeling that the nannying fussbuckets arguments are beginning to collapse - here's Dick Puddlecote reporting on this man's views:

He points out that wood smoke is twice as dangerous as that emitted by cigars and cigarettes; that diesel emissions dwarf the dangers of smoke in a casino which allows it; that passive smoke exposure is on a par with emissions from clothes dryers, popcorn poppers, candles, irons and toasters; and that nicotine itself is a benign concern.

So that just about wraps it up for the passive smoking kills argument then? So can we have our pubs back?


No comments: