Showing posts with label A levels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label A levels. Show all posts

Saturday, 18 August 2018

Gender imbalance - boys, girls and going to university


I knew there was (what I thought a marginal) female majority in young people going up to university. I hadn't appreciated just how big this margin is these days:
‘Of all the A-level entries that were reported today, 55 per cent of them were female, and therefore 45 per cent of them male. That means that there were 81,000 more A-level entries from girls than there were from boys. And if you divide by three, figuring that most people do three A-levels, that’s 27,000 fewer males. That’s almost exactly the gap that we see today in the 18-year-old young men placed in universities compared to young women.’
This is from Mary Curnock Cook, educationalist and former head of UCAS and comes from a Spectator podcast. The report also comments that nobody is really interested in asking whether this gender gap is something requiring some attention. It may be that the young men are doing well-paid vocations like plastering, bricklaying and dicking about on computers but it could also be the case that our education system, having rightly adjusted itself to give greater opportunity to girls, has in the manner of Thurber's bear ended up leaning over too far backwards.

....

Saturday, 21 August 2010

Kids, parents and a few teachers have worked it out - pity the education establishment hasn't

****

Much fuss and bother about 'A' Level results including, of course, the 'it's all fixed in favour of public schools' argument from the unions, Guardianistas and assorted educational experts. Now leaving aside that this Guardian piece is rather speculative (to say the least) and that the Universities say it ain't so, it does appear that the kids, their parents and possibly some teachers (who aren't wasting their time being spokespeople for unions) have worked out the best way to improve the odds of getting into better universities:

This week's A-level results showed that pupils were increasingly shunning so-called "soft" subjects in favour of science, economics and maths.


Bit of a clue there, eh?