Legalising gambling would help stop corruption in sport.

The revelations regarding the Pakistan cricket team are at the same time a tragedy for the game (indeed for sport in general) and also the inevitable consequence of prohibition. Assuming that the allegations have some substance, it seems that the corrupt hand of Asia’s “gambling syndicates” has infected the great game of cricket – and not for the first time. Why is this?

The main reason is that throughout Asia – and in too many other places – gambling is illegal. And – given that people will gamble whether it’s illegal or not – that means the punting business is run by criminals. Which of course in nothing new – ask ‘Shoeless Joe’ Jackson!

If you ban something that people want to do, you hand it over to criminals for them to run. And, given that those criminals are (ipso facto) unregulated, the result is the fix – the criminals set up the system to increase their advantage. Forget about the bank having advantage – this is the bank ensuring it wins.

For the sake of sport – and for the liberty of snails climbing up walls or droplets running down windows – we need gambling to be legalised. Only then can we have any chance of controlling the corruption of sport by the bookies and the sharks.

"Bradford Councillors in Mafia type crime ring." WTF?

***

Have had an odd e-mail (see below). Slightly scary and with a specific allegation relating to Winter Fuel Payments. The e-mail originated from the charmingly named, "Scourge of Shysters" and is sent to three of the District's MPs plus someone at the BBC. And I guess my fellow Councillors - although this isn't clear.

Bradford Councillors in Mafia type crime ring.
Like the lawyers who ripped off the miners compensation fund for millions of £s, Bradford Councillors are involved in a Mafia type ring which is robbing pensioners of Winter Fuel Payments. Names & evidence available. If you are not corrupt, respond to this email address (if you are worried about your own fiddling, better not!) The G-C-X team

As a general rule anonymous stuff goes straight in the bin - don't trust anything from people who aren't brave or honest enough to put their name to it. Especially when it is mildly threatening (and I've had these in the past but never via e-mail)

Any thoughts?
...