Showing posts with label nannying fussbucket. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nannying fussbucket. Show all posts

Saturday, 1 February 2014

Pregnant mums, you've every right to drink in moderation


In an especially nannying article, Emma Barnett, "Women's Editor" of the Daily Telegraph (do they have a "Men's Editor"?) has a go at pregnant women who have the occasional drink:

I am no fan of judgement. I think people are, by and large, a law unto themselves. Last month, however, I was at a dinner party in a painfully cool (both in temperature and temperament) East London warehouse when I noticed a friend’s eight-months-pregnant wife happily knocking back a bottle of beer. “Don’t stare Emma,” hissed my husband. “It’s just the one.” I silently scolded my horrible self. He was right. But then this successful lawyer moved onto the Pinot Grigio. Two great goblets of the stuff. And I found myself in full judgement mode.

Our writer transformed from a gentle, non-judgemental luvvie to a judgemental nanny in one short paragraph. She wheels out some doctor's estimation of the impact of drinking complete with the obligatory scary number:

Last week doctors revealed that up to 7,000 babies a year in Britain are showing signs of developmental damage because their mothers drank during pregnancy. 

In 2012 there were 729,673 live births in the UK so, even at the upper end of Emma's unreferenced estimate, that's less than 1% of total births. Emma then goes on to quote some doctor pal who suggests having a glass of wine is worse than smoking! This doesn't seem to me, however much we should be concerned about those 'up to 7,000' children, that drinking in pregnancy is a major problem.

So what the evidence? The answer is best given as mixed. Some studies show a small negative impact of moderate drinking on birthweight but the most substantial studies really show no significant negative impact of moderate drinking:

The bottom line, according to study co-author John Mcleod, is that "[there's] certainly no evidence that moderate alcohol use by pregnant mums is good for their kids, and [there are] reasons to be cautious about other messages around 'benefits' of moderate alcohol use by pregnant mums. But equally, [there's] no strong evidence for important harmful effects."

So a sort of researcher 'meh' there - probably best not to drink but if you have the odd glass or two during pregnancy it's probably not having any harmful effect on the baby.

More recently a significant study challenges the prior consensus on alcohol affecting birth weight. This is a multi-national study involving 5,628 women who were pregnant for the first time between 2004 and 2011and it concluded that:

Rates of premature birth, babies with low birth weight or small size, and preeclampsia—a potentially life-threatening condition in which a pregnant woman develops high blood pressure—were similar across the alcohol consumption categories

The studies quoted above looked at child development after birth whereas this study only looks at the situation at birth. Again there appear to be few if any negative effects from moderate alcohol consumption during pregnancy.

It seems to me that the proper advice is exactly the advice given to mums now - go easy but if you're out don't feel that you can't have a glass of wine.

....


Friday, 10 May 2013

Lousie Mensch - nannying fussbucket of the month

****

Now that she's decamped to the USA, Louise Mensch erstwhile MP for Corby and, I'm told, a Tory has become a fussbucket. A full blown nannying fussbucket.

Strangely - perhaps Louise believes the bully pulpit of the media more effective - the lovely Mrs Mensch is featured often in the British press. And she's on about bossing women about drinking:

Mrs Mensch attacked the British "culture" of drinking, arguing American women are happier and healthier as they do not drink wine as often as their UK counterparts.

I missed that culture of drinking but I guess it's a hangover from the 'chick lit' that Mrs Mensch used to write. The truth - something that passes by the fussbuckets of this world - is that British women are remarkably abstemious:

The ONS said the proportion of men drinking on five or more days a week fell from 23% in 1998 to 16% in 2011 and that of women from 13% to 9%. But the drop only began to be seen after 2007.

So the "have a glass of wine after a hard day" line that Louise Mensch peddles is simply untrue - even if the figures from the ONS are an underestimate and should be doubled that means that over 80% of women simply aren't conforming to this 'Bridget Jones' stereotype and sloshing back the vino big time. For sure, the Americans drink less (roughly half what we do) but there's no evidence that they're any happier or healthier as a result.

So Louise Mensch is beautiful, successful and slim - despite plenty of vino. This doesn't qualify her - not even a little bit - to give advice on alcohol consumption especially not in such a nannying way. Most especially because she is ill-informed about the science and ignorant of how much British women do drink. Worse still Mrs Mensch seems to want us to embrace that horrible puritan American culture that thinks it OK to give 16 year olds a fast car but a terrible thing to let them have a glass of wine.

Frankly she's welcome to it. Stay in girls, have a glass of wine and stick two fingers up at fussbuckets like Mrs Mensch.

....