The evidence doesn't support the health argument:
Taken as a whole, the epidemiology does not support the claim that ETS causes lung cancer
in non-smokers.
It can only be because they don't like smokers then?
...
Taken as a whole, the epidemiology does not support the claim that ETS causes lung cancer
in non-smokers.
3 comments:
State funded prejudice?
Yes.
It was never about the health of non smokers, rather about denormalistion with the sole intent of inciting fear & hatred among non smokers and guilt among smokers. This required a conspiracy to deliberately lie and mislead, which as far as I can gather is the default position for the Tobacco Control Industry.
Yes, in an email to Michael McFadden, Baroness Murphy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elaine_Murphy,_Baroness_Murphy
admitted the ban was not brought in to protect employees.
Post a Comment