Saturday, 15 December 2012

So why introduce a smoking ban?


The evidence doesn't support the health argument:

Taken as a whole, the epidemiology does not support the claim that ETS causes lung cancer
in non-smokers.

It can only be because they don't like smokers then?



Anonymous said...

State funded prejudice?

proglodyte said...

It was never about the health of non smokers, rather about denormalistion with the sole intent of inciting fear & hatred among non smokers and guilt among smokers. This required a conspiracy to deliberately lie and mislead, which as far as I can gather is the default position for the Tobacco Control Industry.

Jonathan Bagley said...

Yes, in an email to Michael McFadden, Baroness Murphy,_Baroness_Murphy
admitted the ban was not brought in to protect employees.