Showing posts with label small government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label small government. Show all posts

Thursday, 30 May 2013

Abolishing the Department of Culture, Media & Sport - a welcome start...

****

John Major was a huge sports fan married to an opera enthusiast - setting up a ministry of culture and sport rather fitted his outlook (and that of David Mellor, another sport and classical music maven - plus some other peccadilloes best not mentioned in a family blog). But it's an indulgence, there's nothing here that merits such attention (a bit like agriculture, really) and the hints that the DCMS might be for the scrap heap are welcome:

Shadow culture minister Dan Jarvis tweeted last night that "well placed sources in Whitehall" suggested that "#CSR13 may scrap @DCMS - with Culture, Media & Sport going to other Govt depts". 

These seems quite a good idea - the savings won't be huge but it's a start that will hopefully lead to the scrapping and merging of other departments. We don't need a department for business and we certainly don't need three departments with an interest in the environment. This process reduces the number of ministers (and their legions of spin doctors and special advisors) as well as the grand panjandrums of the Whitehall departments concerned.

Not surprisingly Labour and the luvvies (now that's a band name for you) think such public shrinking of the state a terrible thing:

As in 2012, Labour has pledged to oppose the move, with Jarvis warning that it would be "driven by short-term expediency, rather than the desire to plan for the long-term". He told me: "abolishing the department wouldn't be in the long-term interests of sports, or the arts, or the constituent parts of the culture brief. With the importance that they represent to people's daily lives, they deserve that focal point that sits at cabinet." He added: "the DCMS brief, based on its economic contribution alone, well deserves its own department."

This translates and "hey, that's my next job you're abolishing there".

However (boo, hiss) the abolition has been denied:

Unsurprisingly, Dan Jarvis doesn’t know what he’s talking about. There is absolutely no truth in these rumours.

....

Sunday, 31 January 2010

Perhaps Britain needs a Tea Party too?

Britain’s economy stutters along in recession or near recession.

Our Government’s debt spirals out of control.

Our leaders argue over whether to spend more money we don’t have on one thing or another.

Our central bank prints billions in a frantic and desperate attempt to stem the collapse of our financial system.

Ordinary folk see more and more of their cash taken in taxes.

What little cash the Government lets us keep is eaten up by inflation

It really is a mess. And there’s precious little evidence of anyone campaigning to get things sorted out. What Britain needs is a party that believes in opposing excessive government spending and taxation. A Tea Party that believes in:


Fiscal Responsibility: Fiscal Responsibility by government honours and respects the freedom of the individual to spend the money that is the fruit of their own labour.

Constitutionally Limited Government: As the government is of the people, by the people and for the people, in all other matters we support the personal liberty of the individual, within the rule of law.

Free Markets: A free market is the economic consequence of personal liberty.


It seems we need to protest – to stand up and say to those lording themselves above us, squandering our cash on their personal prejudice and funding their petty squabbles: “that’s enough, can we have our country back now? Can we have more modest, more accountable government? Can we have our own money to spend? Can we make our own mistakes and live our own lives free from your interference?

I’ve never marched, never protested, seldom sign petitions. But I’ll protest for this. I’ll march. Might there be others?